Lexington Bans Landlords from Source of Income Discrimination with Pending State Decision Looming

As a significant step towards securing tenant rights, the city of Lexington has enacted a ban on discrimination by landlords based on the source of income renters use to make payments.

Brief Overview

The legislative change, banning income source discrimination wherein landlords refuse to lease premises to individuals who use housing vouchers or other public assistance payments for rent, was voted in favor with a 13-2 majority on February 17, 2024. So far, Lexington and Louisville are the only cities in Kentucky to establish such protection for their tenants. The newly passed rule is set to take effect on March 1st.

Impact on Tenants and Advocacy Groups

Influence from advocacy groups like Kentucky Tenants has been instrumental in bringing about this change. Volunteers from the advocacy group including individuals like Adrian Williams, have been part of discussions at city council meetings and other platforms to support tenant rights.

The relief that the new ordinance brings is, however, tentative for the group, as their focus now shifts toward the ongoing deliberations on House Bill 18 in Frankfort. If passed, this bill could potentially overrule local bans on source of income discrimination.

Reactions from Housing Rights groups and Landlords Association

The Fair Housing Council, an organization committed to the protection and promotion of equal opportunities for tenants, and other civil liberties, is concerned about the impact of House Bill 18.

Landlords and property owners, represented by the Lexington Landlord Association are taking a cautionary approach, waiting for a definitive decision on the state legislation, while continuing to abide by existing local and state landlord regulations.

Persistent Advocacy Efforts

In spite of potential challenges, rights advocacy groups pledge to continue their efforts. Kentucky tenants plan to hold public outreach and service meetings regularly and vow to keep legislative pressures intact.

In addressing the current situation, Williams emphasizes that though the state law may project an impression of voiding civil rights, potential violation of federal laws could still present legal liabilities for erring landlords.

On Going Forward

The collaboration of advocacy groups, city leaders, and tenants, along with the considerations of landlords and property owners, demonstrates a sensitive dynamic in the quest for fair housing practices and tenants’ rights. With the final decision on House Bill 18 looming, all parties remain apprehensive about the future. Yet, the ongoing strides in Lexington and Louisville mark important milestones in the ongoing journey towards securing equitable housing rights across Kentucky.