Kentucky Voters Face Crucial Decision on Amendment Two to Extend Financial Support for Private School Students

Lexington, Ky. – Education is a pivotal issue for Kentucky voters ahead of the upcoming election. One of the key proposals, termed Amendment Two, aims to alter the state constitution by allowing the General Assembly to provide financial support to students who attend private schools outside the public system.

If passed, this amendment would create a framework similar to initiatives seen in neighboring states, where school choice has been a point of contention and legal scrutiny. Schools in states like Indiana, Ohio, West Virginia, and Missouri already have established voucher programs, while Tennessee operates a limited version.

The push for Amendment Two follows a significant ruling by the Kentucky Supreme Court in 2022, which deemed the state’s tax credit scholarship program unconstitutional. This ruling has heightened the stakes as the amendment seeks to reverse that decision, potentially impacting how educational funds are allocated.

Illinois serves as a recent example of the complexities surrounding school choice legislation. In 2017, the state initiated the Invest in Kids Scholarship Tax Credit program, which offered tax credits to donors contributing to scholarships for students from families earning less than 300% of the federal poverty level. However, that program was revoked recently, amid criticisms that it primarily benefited students who were not from low-income backgrounds.

Critics, including advocates from groups like Illinois Families for Public Schools, argue that most beneficiaries of the Illinois program were not representative of the most disadvantaged populations, stating it disproportionately aided white students in better-resourced districts. In contrast, supporters from the Illinois Policy Institute contend that the program did fulfill a need for minority students from low-income backgrounds.

As Kentucky weighs its options, the experience of Illinois highlights potential challenges and criticisms that Amendment Two may face. Proponents assert that allowing funding to follow students would provide necessary opportunities for families who desire alternatives to public education.

The debate over amendment and its implications for future educational structures in Kentucky continues to evolve, as residents prepare to weigh in on this significant question. The outcome of this vote could redefine funding mechanisms for education across the state and set a precedent for how school choice is approached in the future.