Jessamine County, Kentucky – The upcoming election for the Jessamine County Schools (JCS) Board of Education is set to feature several incumbents and challengers vying for positions in districts one, two, and three. The election day is scheduled for November 5, 2024.
In District One, incumbent Bobby Welch faces challenger Rosanna Crusott. Welch, who has served on the board for eight years, highlighted his experience in youth sports and his commitment to helping acclimate new Superintendent Sara Crum and Director of Operations Matt Simpson. He emphasized concerns about the impact of Amendment 2 on public education funding, stating, “I think we always have room for improvement, and I’m not against a total reform of public education.”
Rosanna Crusott focuses on education quality, referencing experiences with grandchildren who faced educational setbacks during the COVID-19 pandemic. She stated, “We need to get back to the basics.” Crusott supports school choice, advocating for options that empower parents and students.
In District Two, incumbent Amy Day is running against Sandi Corma. Day, with a long tenure on the board since 2008, emphasizes increasing academic achievement and supporting teacher retention. She expressed skepticism about Amendment 2, noting, “If the student population is reduced, then we have to let go of teachers and staff.” Corma aims to improve reading scores and discipline, arguing for the importance of understanding home support for students’ education.
In District Three, Debra Hood, a long-serving board member, is challenged by Rachel Baker and Anthony Turner. Hood’s platform prioritizes mental health resources for students, citing the devastating effects of COVID-19 on social development. Baker, a former educator and administrator, advocates for family engagement and inclusion within the school district.
Each candidate has articulated their views on Amendment 2, with varying perspectives on its implications for public education in Jessamine County. Welch and Crusott emphasize the need for cautious evaluation of the amendment’s potential consequences on local funding. Meanwhile, Day and Hood express concern that it would negatively impact resources needed to support students effectively.
