Frankfort, Kentucky: The Future of DEI in Higher Education
In a lively discussion that echoed through the halls of the Kentucky State Capitol, lawmakers are gearing up to delve deeper into the world of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in the state’s universities. This conversation, led by Senator Stephen West, comes after a couple of significant bills related to DEI didn’t make it through the last legislative session. With whispers of renewed discussions starting in January, senators are eager to gather more information on how DEI initiatives are being put into action at colleges and universities across Kentucky.
Gathering Information
As part of this effort, universities statewide have been tasked with sharing details about their DEI offices, including how much they spend on these initiatives, specifics from class syllabi, and other related information. Morehead State and Northern Kentucky University were among the early participants in addressing the state’s interim education committee back in July, laying the groundwork for future discussions.
This week, the spotlight turned to University of Kentucky President Eli Capilouto, who stepped up to the plate less than a month after the flagship university made headlines by disbanding its Office of Institutional Diversity. During his address, Capilouto emphasized a shift in approach, stating, “We are re-committing to the idea that we can only represent everyone if we are impartial facilitators.” His comments hinted at moving away from previous DEI practices.
The Changes in Focus
Capilouto detailed how the university is altering job descriptions within its office and steering clear of statements that might seem political or biased. This new direction has raised eyebrows from both sides of the political fence. For instance, Rep. Steve Rawlings inquired if the university was merely re-branding instead of truly reforming its DEI strategies, given that they had not eliminated any positions from their diversity office.
In response, Capilouto noted that while DEI topics might still arise in classroom discussions or debates, the formal training associated with these initiatives would be reconsidered. This decision sparked further questions, especially from Sen. Reggie Thomas, who expressed his concerns about whether these changes genuinely served the best interest of the university and its diverse population.
Academic Freedom vs. DEI Initiatives
Capilouto shared his worries regarding potential legislation that could infringe on academic freedoms. He made it clear that the steps taken by the university were intended to ensure they could always respond affirmatively to three pivotal questions: “Did we care? Were we fair? And, did we give everyone a fair shot?” This mantra reflects a desire to uphold a just and inclusive academic environment, even amid changing policies.
Continuing the Conversation
It was noted that while approximately 15 positions were part of the disbanded diversity office, the university did not make any layoffs in this process, which is a positive takeaway in these uncertain times. Other universities, including University of Louisville, Eastern Kentucky University, Western Kentucky University, and Murray State, also participated in the discussions, contributing to a broader understanding of DEI efforts across the state.
The conversation around DEI is far from over in Kentucky’s higher education landscape. As lawmakers prepare for the upcoming session in January, many are hopeful that these discussions will lead to a more informed approach that balances the values of diversity and equity while also respecting academic freedom.
As Frankfort continues to engage in this important dialogue, students and faculty alike are watching closely. They know that these decisions could shape the future of their universities, creating an environment that honors every voice while fostering open and honest discussions on crucial societal issues.
